Get rid of `iConditionBitFlag` in favor of a system of individual buff
objects that get composited to a bitflag on-the-fly.
Buff objects can have callbacks for application, expiration, and tick,
making them pretty flexible. Scripting languages can eventually use
these for custom behavior, too.
TODO:
- Get rid of bitflag in BaseNPC
- Apply buffs from passive nano powers
- Apply buffs from active nano powers
- Move eggs to new system
- ???
Was getting frustrated by the inconsistency in our include statements,
which were causing me problems. As a result, I went through and manually
re-organized every include statement in non-core files.
I'm just gonna copy my rant from Discord:
FOR HEADER FILES (.hpp):
- everything you use IN THE HEADER must be EXPLICITLY INCLUDED with the exception of things that fall under Core.hpp
- you may NOT include ANYTHING ELSE
FOR SOURCE FILES (.cpp):
- you can #include whatever you want as long as the partner header is included first
- anything that gets included by another include is fair game
- redundant includes are ok because they'll be harmless AS LONG AS our header files stay lean.
the point of this is NOT to optimize the number of includes used all around or make things more efficient necessarily. it's to improve readability & coherence and make it easier to avoid cyclical issues
Storing certain things in appearance data and others in their own fields
was gross. Now everything is stored on the same level and functions have
been added to generate appearance data when it's needed by the client.
ChatManager -> Chat
MissionManager -> Missions
NanoManager -> Nanos
TransportManager -> Transport
ChunkManager -> Chunking
BuddyManager -> Buddies
GroupManager -> Groups
RacingManager -> Racing
ItemManager -> Items
NPCManager and PlayerManager remain.
Note: You can use git log --follow src/file.cpp to trace the history of
a file from before it was renamed.
This is terrible. It was a mistake to do this before cleaning up the
actual code. It might be better not to use this commit and to do this
refactor in a different order or something.
I've kept all the functions in their original namespaces for now, since
putting them all into the same one will cause collissions, and this is
all getting rewritten soon anyway.
