Ternary operators have a lower precedence than arithmetic operators, so
what was actually occurring here is "return (out + full) ? x : y" which most
definitely isn't intended, given we calculate out recursively above. We
were essentially doing a lot of work for nothing.
This can cause warnings about static constructors, and is also not ideal
performance-wise due to the indirection through std::function. This also
keeps the behavior itself separate from the surrounding code, which can
make it nicer to read, due to the size of the code.
Given these are only added to the class to allow those functions to
access the private constructor, it's a better approach to just make them
static functions in the interface, to make the dependency explicit.
This converts it into a regular constructor parameter. There's no need
to make this a template parameter on the class when it functions
perfectly well as a constructor argument.
This also reduces the amount of code bloat produced by the compiler, as
it doesn't need to generate the same code for multiple different
instantiations of the same class type, but with a different fill value.
* Implemented fatal:u properly
fatal:u now is properly implemented with all the ipc cmds. Error reports/Crash reports are also now implemented for fatal:u. Crash reports save to yuzu/logs/crash_reports/
The register dump is currently known as sysmodules send all zeros. If there are any non zero values for the "registers" or the unknown values, let me know!
* Fatal:U fixups
* Made fatal:u execution break more clear
* Fatal fixups
* Stubbed IRS
Currently we have no ideal way of implementing IRS. For the time being we should have the functions stubbed until we come up with a way to emulate IRS properly.
* Added IRS to logging backend
* Forward declared shared memory for irs
* Added glObjectLabels for renderdoc for textures and shader programs
* Changed hardcoded "Texture" name to reflect the texture type instead
* Removed string initialize
This isn't used anywhere within the header, so we can remove it, along
with the include that was previously necessary. This also uncovers an
indirect include in the cpp file for the assertion macros.
This was very likely intended to be a logical OR based off the
conditioning and testing of inversion in one case.
Even if this was intentional, this is the kind of non-obvious thing one
should be clarifying with a comment.
